schmonz.com is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.
This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.
Despite being well aware of & not wanting to use #FreeBSD any more due it being #AITainted now, am still using it due to the reliable support of #OpenZFS ...
- available during install time without the need for manual chanting (compare "ZFSBootMenu"^0 set up);
- for root("/") file system (NetBSD^1 needs manual chanting^2).
0- To avoid #AIMarred system, moving to a #Linux distribution is pointless
1- #ZFS is Solaris version.
2- #NetBSD: #RootOnZFS https://wiki.netbsd.org/root_on_zfs/ .
Proof of concept.
This is FreeBSD's #dd, lightly modified to use getopt_long() with a fairly straightforward set of long options mirroring the JCL-style ones.
It's a fairly simple modification, and a very similar one would apply to NetBSD.
This is not the hard part. (-:
Can any NetBSD knowers help me? I just installed the latest NetBSD (11.0, the i386 port) on an x86 laptop to try it out again. However, I can't find a recent Firefox (newer than 52ESR) in pkgin:
$ pkgin search firefox
basilisk-2025.10.10nb2 UXP-based web browser inspired by pre-Servo Firefox
fira-4.202 Mozilla's font for Firefox OS
firefox52-52.9.0nb80 Web browser with support for extensions (version 52ESR)
firefox52-l10n-52.9.0 Language packs for www/firefox (version 52)
firefox_decrypt-0.7.0nb3 Extract passwords from Mozilla Firefox profiles
lz4json-0.0.20191229 Unpack lz4json files as generated by Firefox's bookmark backups
py311-FxA-0.8.1 Firefox Accounts client library for Python
py312-FxA-0.8.1 Firefox Accounts client library for Python
py313-FxA-0.8.1 Firefox Accounts client library for Python
py314-FxA-0.8.1 Firefox Accounts client library for Python
syncstorage-rs-0.21.1nb4 Firefox Sync Storage server in Rust=: package is installed and up-to-date
<: package is installed but newer version is available
>: installed package has a greater version than available package
$ pkgin search librewolf
No results found for librewolf
Please help?
In theory, I could attempt to compile it from pkgsrc, but compiling Firefox is already extremely unpleasant on a fast x86_64 computer with huge amounts of RAM, or (that one was SeaMonkey, presumably less heavy than Firefox itself) on a PowerPC computer with 1GB of RAM, I don't even want to try it this laptop with its 256MB of RAM...
This is fascinating. I'd taken for granted that NetBSD had a no-slop policy, but it isn't quite that straightforward.
From their commit guidelines, "Code generated by a large language model or similar technology, such as GitHub/Microsoft's Copilot, OpenAI's ChatGPT, or Facebook/Meta's Code Llama, is presumed to be tainted code, and must not be committed without prior written approval by core."
So, it's not a closed door.
https://www.netbsd.org/developers/commit-guidelines.html
Compare with Gentoo's policy:
This also adds prebuilt #NetBSD binaries, logs when challenges are accepted, cleans up and consolidates the worker code, fixes an edge case in Content-Security-Policy parsing, and more.
@Jonas nothing to worry about. I would suggest first playing around with virtualbox or qemu to understand #NetBSD ask community here for help or mailing list or any community forum. Once you get comfortable with terminology and how things work you can try it on bare metal machine and see how it goes.
Well it wouldn't be at random. getopt(3) is fairly well known and established at this point, and using it a fairly mainstream notion since the days of AT&T System 5 Release 3, although there are parts of the world that look askance at long options (invented in 1989 if memory serves) as if they are heresy.
And it wouldn't change the JCL-like syntax one whit.
I wonder whether anyone has actually attempted this. A quick look around doesn't reveal anyone even questioning this religious tenet, which is amazing given how people have reinvented stuff over the years. I would still be surprised, and I haven't looked everywhere. But it might actually be, @aris , that you are the first to suggest this in 40 years.
If it's taken that long for someone to even float the idea, my prediction of Sol going red giant is still looking spot on. (-:
Some napkin math for #BSD CVEs discovered with AI assistance:
#FreeBSD 27
#OpenBSD 1
#NetBSD 0
#DragonFlyBSD 0
boostedOne wouldn't have to discard the old syntax, thanks to what #NetBSD and #Illumos have done long since. One could make it fall back to the JCL-like syntax in the cases where no modern getopt() options were used.
All existing shell scripts that run on NetBSD and Illumos or that use GNU coreutils or BusyBox, at least, won't be using any modern options at the moment, because that's a fatal error, so there's no existing scripting to trip up.
The GNU and BusyBox people have snuck --help into their dd(1)s, but I don't see that being conflicted with. (-:
Upgrade du serveur de #Debian 12 -> Debian 13 ✅
Juste un énorme plantage durant l'install - probablement à cause d'un dépôt mal configuré (et qui semblait encore référencé Bullseye...). Je suis reparti du dernier snapshot #hetzner , puis upgrade classique, reboot et on est à jour.
... même si je serais sérieusement tenté par une VM #NetBSD si je devais repartir d'une install.
@aris made a good point. BSD fixed the ps(1) command to have getopt(3) syntax in 1990. Maybe it's finally time to do the same to dd(1).
#NetBSD put the beginnings in place in its dd(1) 26 years ago, and is currently ahead of all of the other BSDs in this respect.
https://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/bin/dd/dd.c.diff?r1=1.17;r2=1.18
#Illumos also introduced the beginnings of getopt() to dd, at some point before going open source.
At this rate, we should get modern argument syntax as an optional extra in dd just before Sol goes red giant. (-:
FIND yourself a a linux distribution or BSD that does reject AI; use it and donate to it.
If you can't move your daily driver move a secondary machine. Tinker with it, fit it into your life where it makes sense.
YEAH the linux kernel has slop. Most programming languages have slop. Most desktop environments have slop, you will have dependencies that are still slop. This is a big problem; there is no magic off switch to fixing this overnight.
We are in the early days of dealing with a contaminate that polluters are actively dumping into our digital environment.
It is going to take a long time before anyone can truly be slop free.
But support, and invest in the folks doing that hard work which will build a slop free future.
Starlight Network maintains a list of slop rejecting operating systems and distros here: https://noai.starlightnet.work/list.html #floss #AntiAI #linux #bsd #netbsd #elementaryos #gentoo
@argv_minus_one I think #NetBSD's stance is better it not just avoid AI LLM code but also any means of copy paste from other places or any means which can taint Base operating system.
When I see someone say that moving away from an OS that has questionable choices would require "living a hairshirt existence" I laugh out loud. The first 1/3 of my "Linux lifetime" was just that.
I was there when Linux was new. The chances of a UNIX app not being provided by your distribution was quite high. You had to manually calculate monitor and video card clock timings to get a GUI. You probably had to dual boot if you wanted to do anything like gaming.
1
Early adopters and contributors refused to accept this situation and stuck with it. It went from hairshirt to mainstream in part due to people sticking to their principles. And, above that, the principles of open source.
So yes, switching is hard. It will be difficult for a time, but enough people standing by their principles can lead to critical mass. It's unbelievable that the very people whose careers are built on open source are forgetting how it works.
Sending good vibes to everyone in the Debian community navigating the recent transitions. If you're using this moment to do a little distro-hopping, consider jumping over to the BSD side. NetBSD offers a completely independent codebase built on a classic, predictable philosophy. You might just find your new permanent home! 🚩💻
#NetBSD #Debian #FOSS #noai #TechCommunity #antiai
The tragedy of #Debian accepting AI 'contributions' is that, most of the time, you are accepting stuff that:
a) is someone else's code, with all the potential legal issues (hence #NetBSD stance on it)
b) is of a very dubious quality, since it went through an AI blender
Just remember: an 'AI' does not exist and has no concept of code, quality and correctness -- I feel like we will soon see the first CVE with a CVSS 9.99 score in AI supplied slop vile coding due to this.
Funnily enough, I was never really into #Debian ... I appreciate the quality of the distro, but... I don't know, too many moving parts, I guess.
I will continue supporting #Slackware I'll look into #Guix and, of course, #OpenBSD and #NetBSD as well as #HardenedBSD .
The line is drawn. It is time to choose your side.
#netBSD is the one that's super-anti AI. it even has a macbook install page - for twenty year old models. this should be good.
oh, wow. the iso that was dd'd as were all the other ones isn't even detected as bootable. they got a special, USB image .gz available for download. how bad do I wanna dick with that at 9 MB/s write speeds?
We are counting down to the European *BSD event of the year! 😈⛳🐡
Big thank you to our bronze sponsor: Prodottoinrete
https://prodottoinrete.it/
If you haven't secured your spot yet, now's the time!
https://tickets.eurobsdcon.org/
📅 You can check out the program at https://events.eurobsdcon.org/2026/schedule/
EuroBSDCon 2026 in Brussels, Belgium 🇧🇪
September 09-13, 2026
#EuroBSDCon #EuroBSDCon2026 #BSD #RUNBSD #FreeBSD #NetBSD #OpenBSD
#Debian was structured as a democracy of developers (maybe technically a platonic aristocracy, but it does not matter here).
Thanks to this, it got trust that turned it into a fundamental building block for #Linux users (most used distro are Debian derivatives).
Unfortunately, such trust also attracted commercial interest.
Now most of Debian Developers (just like most of #Linux kernel's devs) are corporate employees that would not be assigned to Debian development if they would oppose corporare interests.
So ultimately Debian cannot be trusted anymore: the vote on #LLM is just an evidence of this fact.
To people who use it since decades (I started with Potato because of its focus on #freedom), it's a pain.
Right now I'm slowly moving to #NetBSD.
@skjeggtroll@mastodon.online @freshstart@hachyderm.io @neil@mastodon.neilzone.co.uk
As of today, I believe NetBSD is one of the most important operating systems to consider for your deployments.
With hardware costs rising dramatically, portability and efficiency have become more important than ever. If prices do not come down, we will probably have to adapt and create new kinds of hardware, at lower cost. And NetBSD, by its very nature, will be very easy to port to that hardware.
Does it run on your modern PC? Maybe. Maybe not.
But it runs on your server. On your VPS. On your SBC. On your old computer, which may still have a lot to give, especially if you want to keep ownership of your own data.
And I know something about old hardware still having a lot to give:
https://it-notes.dragas.net/2023/08/27/that-old-netbsd-server-running-since-2010/
No jails or containerisation? smolBSD has already shown that a reduced NetBSD kernel can be so small that it can be started in milliseconds, while also adding the security benefits of virtualisation. A different concept, certainly. But one that already exists and can already be used.
Linux itself has opened up to AI. That is a choice I will not comment on.
But from now on, for those who do not want LLM-generated code in their operating system, there are essentially two options: fork Linux (!!!), or choose something different.
And NetBSD is that something different.
Already in 2024:
“...code generated by a large language model or similar technology (e.g. ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot) is presumed to be tainted (i.e. of unclear copyright, not fitting NetBSD's licensing goals) and cannot be committed to NetBSD.”
#NetBSD #RunBSD #smolBSD #IT #SysAdmin #OwnYourData #ModernTech
@linuxuserspace
For the kernel:
#Linux❗
#Hurd❗
#FreeBSD ☑️
#NetBSD ☑️
#OpenBSD❔
#DragonflyBSD❔
#KolibriOS❗
#RedoxOS ✅
#Haiku ☑️
❗LLMs used
❔Unknown or unclear position about LLMs but I didn't found any LLM generated commits
☑️ LLM use forbidden or limited for the code
✅ LLM use forbidden
...let's lower the barriers even further!
Now this instance is running on a Raspberry Pi A+ (1 core @ 700 MHz, 256MB RAM), so even less than the Raspberry Pi Zero W it was running on before.
On NetBSD, of course!
#littleFedi #NetBSD #RunBSD #OwnYourData #Decentralization #OwnYourVoice
@cffiegel @hermod @phaeton @pOtiron @bastamedia
#Linux❗
#Hurd❗
#FreeBSD ☑️
#NetBSD ☑️
#OpenBSD❔
#DragonflyBSD❔
#KolibriOS❗
#RedoxOS ✅
#Haiku ☑️
❗LLMs utilisés
❔Position inconnue ou peu claire mais pas de commits par LLM (en tout cas à ma connaissance)
☑️ Usage de LLMs interdit ou limité pour le code
✅ Usage de LLMs interdit
Certaines distributions linux comme Gentoo ont également interdit les contributions par IA. Malheureusement, il me semble qu'aucun système grand public n'a banni les LLMs.
...let's lower the barriers even further!
Now this instance is running on a Raspberry Pi A+ (1 core @ 700 MHz, 256MB RAM), so even less than the Raspberry Pi Zero W it was running on before.
On NetBSD, of course!
#littleFedi #NetBSD #RunBSD #OwnYourData #Decentralization #OwnYourVoice
Right. I've done the same. I've been more forthright than the #pkgsrc people.
The #xmlto in #slashpackage here removes 'type' completely, gets rid of all of the other #Bashisms that I can find, uses sh as the interpreter, and in a modicum of testing (re-building the nosh manual set) works with dash on #Debian and the #FreeBSD and #NetBSD Almquist shells.
It also defaults the wwwbrowser configuration setting to www-browser (as used in Debian's alternatives system).
https://github.com/jdebp/slashpackage/tree/trunk/textutils/xmlto-0.0.29
boostedUpstream wasn't experienced/use NetBSD enough to want to merge it (fair), so pushed my fork of susmb (a FUSE implementation of SMB v3) for NetBSD support to Codeberg here: https://codeberg.org/gourd753/susmb-netbsd
If I can hammer out one remaining issue (the PERFUSE_BUFSIZE environment variable needing to be an arbitrary size for large file transfers to work) I'll see about trying to get a netbsd package for it but atm it's too finicky for me to feel comfortable with that.
Most of this setup has been progressively pulled out of ewaste piles over a period of several years and I think it's finally time for it to run NetBSD and fulfil its true destiny.
Is a computer from 2012 actually "retro"? Well ... it will be when I'm done with it.
The #xmlto people did actually try to remove the #Bashisms themselves, over a decade ago. But they left it still auto-configuring to pick bash instead of changing that as well. Which is what it does if one builds from vanilla source today.
https://pagure.io/xmlto/issue/3/
Then, 10 years later, the change happened that put the bashism back in that creates the #NetBSD noise, perhaps because they did not go the whole way and make it a /bin/sh script, which would have highlighted that.
Found it. pkgsrc is explicitly setting the XMLTO_BASH_PATH environment variable (amusingly, entirely ignoring the strong hint in the variable name) before running configure . I was looking for a patch; but this isn't being done with a patch.
Since I've patched out all of the type -p and type uses (sometimes being used in wildly overcomplex ways) and replaced them with command -v, I wonder whether I can do the same.
I added #xmlto to my #slashpackage tree because I wanted to patch out the 'type -p' thing that causes a complaint on #NetBSD every time the tool is run.
Oddly, building from vanilla source makes it a bash script, as (from reading the Fedora issues list) the authors actually intend. It isn't supposed to be a POSIX sh script. bash has type -p .
Yet the installed-from-package xmlto on NetBSD has /bin/sh as the interpreter, hence the complaint about the #Bashisms.
I wonder what's going on.
boosted
lia, a bun type creature
[she/they · sie/ihr oder es/deren/denen] » 🌐
@lianna@micro.webgarden.click
Full disclosure: I personally have not used any BSDs before.
I am not sure whether the BSDs are really going to be those steadfast anti-AI warriors that some people make them out to be today in the light of the Debian-going-AI and Linux-going-AI news.
From what I can tell, the main philosophical difference between the various Linuxes and BSDs have always been two things:
BSDs generally seem to disagree with the copyleft ideal of the GNU licences and instead prefer their own lax, permissive licences that allow proprietary and all other kinds of nasty commercial uses. This does not appear to be a very trustworthy stance when we're talking about AI.
And regarding modularity, BSDs seem to err on the side of authority, preferring their base system to be one unified opinionated whole that's in turn designed to be as cohesive and functional as possible; while the Linuxes sacrifice that stability for user choice and modularity in a big patchwork. But this is also not a particularly appealing stance for someone who enjoys customisation and realises that sometimes, important software projects turn out to be problematic or compromised and need to be abandoned quickly.
#linux #debian #gnulinux #bsd #openbsd #netbsd #freebsd #ai #antiAi
Any idea how to create a keybind for super+. (period)?
This doesn't seem to work at all:
"." = mod4 : all : !"~/bin/emoji-picker"
Pressing super+. just gives me a period, and there's nothing in ~/.xsession-errors to indicate that it triggered anything at all.
Nevermind! Found the solution, derp:
"period" = mod4 : all : !"~/bin/emoji-picker"
#NetBSD is famous for being able to run on any hardware imaginable, yet somehow I've not been able to install it successfully on even the most bog-standard machines.
boosted
imagine the avatar with a hat in a color other than white [he/him (they/them works too)] » 🌐
@algernon@come-from.mad-scientist.club
Come to think of it... what if I packaged #iocaine properly for #NetBSD, and submitted it to pkgsrc?
Or if not that, if I provided something pkgin can install (preferably a binary)?
I have a nix flake already, because NixOS is what I use. I have a Debian package, because that's been often requested, and was relatively simple to do. Both NixOS and Debian have a stance on LLMs I do not agree with - NetBSD has a much more reasonable policy. Thus, it feels like I should provide a package for that OS too.
I'll do that for 4.x, later.
boosted@chadmccullough This saddens me as well, I recently started testing NetBSD for this reason, but I was holding out hope on this Debian vote, as it has been my preferred OS distribution for decades.
Oh, well. Time to put more energy into the testing of/transition to NetBSD. I also just updated my software donations rotation, replacing Debian with the NetBSD foundation.
Wrote a patch to get SUSMB, a FUSE implementation of SMB working on #NetBSD, and running into an issue where files larger than a certain size hang the driver. This appears to be related to the "PERFUSE_BUFSIZE" environment variable, and some forum posts I've seen indicate this is an issue across PERFUSE given it came up with NTFS-3G.
Does anyone here with more NetBSD experience than my full uh, week lightly toying with this have any experience with this?